October 17th, 2009

Anti-Bahai Pograms, Then and Now

I read about the impending trial and all-too-likely execution of seven Bahais in Iran as I was reading about the outbreak of Babi/Bahai-killing in Iran a little over a century before. As I was wending my way through Mirza Yahya Dawlatabadi’s memoirs, Hayat-e Yahya, I came across a passage describing the mob violence let loose against these heretics in Yazd and Isfahan in 1903. The author, who was himself called by some historians a successor to the babi_koshi_01Babi movement, appears actually to have chosen the path of a Muslim reformer. His references in this passage to Babis and Bahais reveal a feigned or genuine ignorance about the difference between them.1

In the beginning of this passage, Mirza Yahya claims that the Bahais/Babis were under Russian protection, since their main base in Iran was in Astarabad (present day Gorgan), which is in the very north of Iran and thus well within Russian’s informal sphere of influence. Since the network of Bahais (as he now calls them) were active throughout the Qajar governmental administration, they were a powerful weapon in the hands of the Russians. The British saw it necessary to deprive the Russians of this weapon and so incited the clergy against the Bahais. It is not necessary to believe in this elaborate tale of international intrigue to appreciate that the rise of foreign domination of Iran would heighten tension between the Muslim majority and religious sectarians.2

As for Yazd, there were many catastrophes. Nor did they refrain from Violating the innocent women and children of those accused [of Babism/Bahaism]. They took the suckling babes from their cradles and brought their mouths to the nozzle of a boiling samovar so that the babe would think that it was his mother’s breast and open its mouth, but insteat of milk, it would imbibe boiling water until he lost his life. One of the people of Yazd, who came to Tehran after this event, expressed his piety and courage for the author by telling him, “It was said that a neighboring merchant’s child was a Babi. He had just married and had to leave town for some reason. I went to him, cut of his head, wrapped it in a kerchief, went back to town, and presented it to his newly-wedded wife.” It was also said that in Rabi I 1321 [June 1903], in the midst of Yazd’s Babi-killing troubles, they told the ignorant teacher in a newly-constructed school that the father of one of the students had been killed after being accused of Babism. The teacher turned to that students and said, “Praise be Allah, Lord of the worlds, that they have also sent your father to Hell.” The innocent child shook and wept and wailed out loud, wanting to leave the school and ask after his father. The teacher said, “It is clear that you are also a Babi.” He bound him to the pillory and beat him for a long while with sticks. News reached his family. His young sister rushed with all her might to the school and saw her little brother had passed out under the blows of sticks and threw herself on top of him. The people attacked the school on hearing this commotion. The siblings were both killed by being pummeled and stomped to death by the people. Many such tragedies occurred. Yes, riot is blind, not distinguishing between small and large, innocent [and guilty], especially when hatreds and intrigues are involved and particularly when, in the eyes of the fanatical people, the protection of piety is also bound up with it.3

Today, “the protection of piety” is tied to the manipulation of anti-Zionist sentiment by an unscrupulous regime. Mob violence is now taken over by the State, which satisfies the blood lust of what is left of the fanatical rabble.

Another story also came to mind. During the Islamic Revolution of 1979, there was a Bahai center and a mosque in reasonable proximity in one neighborhood. A mob went off to attack the Bahai center. The mosque’s janitor, a simple, illiterate Muslim with the tell-tale stubble on his cheeks who was known to one and all, got wind of this and threw himself in front of the Bahai house of worship and talked the rabble down.

Here are some links to sites about the looming trials and related sites regarding the persecution of the Bahais in the Islamic Republic:

http://www.monasdream.com/

http://stoppersecutionnow.org/

Notes:

1 He would be traveling down the same path as others who had had a brush with Babism, such as Mirza Aqa Khan Kermani and Haji Sheikh Ahmad Ruhi, who ultimately became fiery pan-Islamists. Compare Hayat-e Yahya, Chapter 19 and Ahmad Kasravi’s Tarikh-e Mashruteye Iran, p. 136 ff.

2 Kasravi considers the Babis to have been tools of the British and the Bahais to be tools of the Russians. For his reasoning, see Tarikh-e Mashruteye Iran, p. 291.

3 Hayat-e Yahya, p. 322

Print This Post
October 3rd, 2009

Mir Hosein Mousavi Is Intent on Overthrow

Kawsari: Mir Hosein Mousavi Is Intent on Overthrow

Source: IRNA http://www.irna.ir/View/FullStory/?NewsId=712931

Esmail Kawsari is once more beating the drums for the prosecution of Mir Hosein Mousavi. This insistence, added to Kawsari’s important public position (he is the Vice President of Parliament’s

Esmail Kawsari

Esmail Kawsari

Commission for Foreign Affairs and National Security) might presage a new stage in the repression–an attack on Mir  Hosein Mousavi himself.
–The translator

The Vice President of the National Security Commission of the Islamic Consultative Council said, “Mir Hosein Mousavi’s actions and behavior after the presidential elections indicate that he is intent on overthrowing the sacred Islamic Republican System.”

Esmail Kawsari emphasized in an interview with IRNA, “Perhaps Mir Hosein Mousavi did not at first intend to overthrow the Islamic Republican system, but by taking the course of law-breakers and riot-inciters, he has shown that he is inclined toward this.”

He continued, “Mir Hosein’s insistence on law-breaking and fleeing from the law has been conscious, and he must retreat from these acts of his. Whenever anyone, anywhere does something negative, he must anticipate the consequences.”

This representative of the Islamic Consultative Assembly added, “I believe that people like Mehdi Karoubi and Mohammad Khatami should be tried alongside Mir Hosein Mousavi and be punished in accordance with their deeds. They, too, played an important and decisive role in the recent riots and disturbances.”

Kawsari said, “These three people must be tried in a proper court for the crime of taking measures against national security and wrecking the quality of the sacred Islamic Republican system and be turned over to the law. This important task can demonstrate the system’s strength and firmness.”

The Vice President of the National Security Commission of the Islamic Consultative Council added, “Those who act outside the law’s framework and put society’s security in danger with their illogical and riotous behavior must answer for this behavior and deeds of theirs.”

In conclusion, he recalled, “The country’s judicial branch must treat scofflaws with severity. Such behavior can prevent future expected riots.”

Print This Post
September 29th, 2009

Mehdi Karoubi’s Second Letter to Hashemi Rafsanjani

Mehdi Karoubi’s Second Letter to Hashemi Rafsanjani: What Is Your Answer to People Who Are Questioning the Duties of the Assembly [of Experts] Presided over by You under Such Circumstances?

Source: Islamic Republican News Agency (IRNA) http://www2.irna.ir/fa/news/view/menu-234/8807046059143439.htm

Date: 5 Mehr 1388 (September 27, 2009)

In the name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate

Ayatollah Hashemi-Rafsanjani
Honorable President of the Assembly of Experts
Greetings

This is the second letter which I have written to you following the recent pseudo-elections to the presidency. I wrote the first because I had heard some very unpleasant and disturbing news from among the arrestees and I saw it as my duty to look into these events in accordance with your legal position and not allow transgressions against the life and property and honor of the people to become an ordinary occurrence. Unfortunately, this letter had no effect among the officials and you saw how negligence and contempt for the people’s rights has incinerated the trust we had harvested and ruined our system’s regard. Of course, the officials know the interest of their government. And so, if that letter accomplished nothing, I said to myself that perhaps it was beyond you to look into this letter.

But now I write this second letter to you because I saw that a session of the Assembly of Experts held and what needed to have been raised in it was not and what ought to have been investigated by members of this Assembly was not investigated. In a word, the Assembly of Experts, which much be the most distinguished supervisory institution in the Islamic Republic, has been turned into an ineffective institution. The result of this session was simply a few speeches and a statement which could have been issued without convening the session and gathering the esteemed members of this Assembly and exerting so much effort.

Click here to see the rest of the article.

Print This Post
September 27th, 2009

Javad Larijani Compares Mousavi to Rajavi, Attacks Sayyed Hasan Khomeini

Javad Larijani’s Criticism of Hasan Khomeini; Mir Hosein Mousavi’s Tone Is Like Masoud Rajavi’s

Source: Islamic Republican News Agency (IRNA) http://www2.irna.ir/fa/news/view/menu-234/8807046059143439.htm

Date: 5 Mehr 1388 (September 27, 2009)

Criticizing the measures of Mir Hosein Mousavi and Hasan Khomeini after the presidential elections, the Secretary of the Judiciary’s Human Rights Office emphasized, “Mousavi was guilty of a great sin after the revolution and launched the reformist faction in the direction of protesting the system.”

According to a report by IRNA’s parliamentary reporter, Mohammad Javad Larijani, in comments made in the Majlis on the occasion of the opening of the Iranian Astronomical Society’s display, referring to the events which arose in the election’s aftermath, said, “Protesting against the election’s results is everyone’s right, but rebelling against the system is not right.”

He added, “If they had kept themselves from being angry after the elections, they would have seen that many of the Hypocrites [Organization of People’s Mojahedin of Iran] and Zionists were applauding their activities.”

Click here to see the rest of the article.

Print This Post