IRAN RISES

1. Mr. Karoubi’s claims as quoted from the people around him or Mr. Mir Hosein Mousavi are baseless and empty of truth.
2. Mr. Karoubi had claimed in regard to Ms. S[aideh] P[uraqayi] that she was the child of a soldier who had been poisoned in a chemical attack who, along with her mother,⁷ would cry out “Allahu akbar” at night and said that they had arrested her and then injured her and then, after several days, secretly buried her body, which had been burned by acid, and, in regard to this same S[aideh] P[uraqayi], sites tied to Messrs. Mir Hosein Mousavi and Karoubi and various counter-revolutionary media, referring to sites tied to these two people, have scribbled much against the system and its institutions, a corner of which and the result of the investigation are presented as follows:

On 8/6/88, on some sites, it said,

The exposure of the name of one of the martyrs who had been secretly buried in Plot 302 in Behesht-e Zahra, S[aideh] P[uraqayi] (her full name was mentioned on the site–Tribunal) was a victim of the plainclothesmen. New information reached the Green Wave of Freedom two days ago about a forgotten martyr of the Green Movement, whose details we have reviewed over the past two days and have become certain of its truth. [...] S[aideh] P[uraqayi (Amayi)] the young daughter whose body is now buried in one of the forgotten graves of Parcel 302 of Behesht-e Zahra was the only child of a martyred soldier, A[bbas] P[uraqayi (Amayi)], who, while busy crying “Allahu Akbar” from the roof of her home [...] one of the nights after the coup, was arrested by plainclothes forces [...] the Basij. After twenty days, her body was identified by her mother in one of the cold storage depots in south Tehran. [...]
It is worth saying that the funeral ceremonies for the martyr Saideh Pouraqayi (Amayi) was held on Saturday, Shahrivar 7 in a restricted fashion in the Qolhak (her place of residence) and members of the Green Movement were present to present their condolences to the grieving family of this poor martyr.

In a statement on the so-called death of this woman, it says,

… Thus we report the passing of a young rosebud, the late S[aideh] P[uraqayi], the only child of the martyred soldier A[li] P[uraqayi] to her family and acquaintances.

The matter of this person was looked into and it was determined that:

1. Her father was not a martyr. He had died several years before and S[aideh] P[uraqayi] was absolutely not an only child and the daughter of a martyr.
2. She had problems with her mother and had run away from home six times since 1386/2008 and her mother had referred to the security centers to find her each time and in some cases she was returned home after some days and in several cases she was arrested and sent to prison with other boys and girls or sent to her mother by security officers. An appropriate report is attached.
   In the latest incident, the mother of S[aideh] P[uraqayi], named A. A., wrote on 21/4/88 [July 12, 2009] to one of the authorities,

   On Saturday, 13/4/88 [July 4, 2009] at 1:45, I left the house to get some medicine. Upon returning, I noticed my daughter was missing and I have had no news of her since then. I request that you send out and order to find my child.

3. Based on information, this lady contacted [the authorities?] a few days ago and said, “I will return home after a few days.”
4. Her mother expressed ignorance of what Mr. Karoubi and those connected with Mr. Mir Hosein Mousavi and related sites said and wrote and said, “I do not know that my daughter has been arrested or left home as in previous cases. I have no information about her situation.”
5. What is certain now is that S[aideh] P[uraqayi] is missing. Just as in previous times, she has left home and the other issues raised by Mr. Karoubi and people related to Mr. Mir Hosein Mousavi have absolutely no validity.
6. [The text says "8".] The aforementioned mother said, “Someone got in touch with our house and said, ‘Your daughter has been killed and her body has been buried,’ and hung up the phone without introducing himself. I, who have suffered from her previous flights among the neighbors and acquaintances, and this time, too, my daughter has been absent for some time, and this phone call upset me still more. I told a neighbor named Eshraqi (an employee of the National Bank and connected with Mr. Mir Hosein Mousavi’s staff) and Mrs. Kashani, who had been involved in my daughter’s previous flights and it was decided that I hold a funeral service for her. Mr. Eshraqi took care of what was involved in this, reserving a mosque, etc.
   The day after I had raised this issue with Mr. Eshraqi and it had been decided to hold a funeral service for her, at about ten at night someone named Mr. Maqiseh phoned our house and said, “I offer my condolences. I will participate in your service.” I said, “I don’t know you at all, and this is absolutely not appropriate.” Mr. Maqiseh said, “Your daughter has been killed. Why?” I insisted, “I absolutely don’t know you and this is absolutely not appropriate.” Mr. Maqiseh hung up.⁸
   The day that we held the service in the Qolhak Mosque, I was very suprised when the eulogist announced that Mr. Mir Hosein Mousavi was participating. They then informed me that Mr. Mir Hosein wanted to come to our home and offer condolences. I refused. From the day before the funeral service to two or three days after, people who introduced themselves as being from Mr. Mir Hosein Mousavi kept contacting me, raising issues of which I had no awareness or saying things that I denied.⁹
   On 10/6/88 at around 9:30 at night, Mr. Maqiseh came to our front door and said, “I have come along with the wife of Javad Emam¹⁰ on behalf of the committee of Messrs. Mousavi and Karoubi to present our condolences. I have also informed Majlis member Mr. Katuzian¹¹ so that he, too, will come.” I said, “I do not know you and am at home alone,” and did not open the door. Mr. Maqiseh said, “Why are you afraid. We have come to help you and pursue this issue.” I did not consent and did not give him permission to enter the house. Mr. Katuzian, for his part, came to th house around 10:30. I told him, too, “I am home alone,” and did not allow him in.

With these matters being clarified, Mr. Karoubi was summoned once again to the Attorney General at 2 p.m. on 16/6/88. The investigation’s results and the means of dealing with them were explained in the presence of the Tribunal.
At the beginning of the session, before explaining the investigation’s results, the Tribunal asked Mr. Karoubi if he had anything else to tell them about his claims that he had not said in the previous session.
Mr. Karoubi said, “Apparently, S[aideh] P[uraqayi] was not the daughter of a martyr and there was an error in this matter. The daughter of a lady came to me with another person and said, ‘I am S[aideh] P[uraqayi]’s daughter and our father was not a martyr, but died a few years ago and I wanted to find out how my sister died.’ I [Karoubi--Tribunal] said, ‘I do not have information about that and I had not heard about this.’ She said, ‘Let them give me her address.’ I said, ‘How can you not have your sister’s address?’ She said, ‘We had severe difficulties with our father’s wife and I do not visit them and do not have her address.’”¹²
Mr. Karoubi was spoken to in detail and in a friendly fashion and the details of the investigation were reviewed with him. He agreed that the issues raised about S[aideh] P[uraqayi] were completely baseless and raised with political motivations. Similarly, when the points related to E[brahim] Sh[arifi]’s CD and it was said that his office announced immediately after he came to the judiciary that Mr. E[brahim] Sh[arifi] was missing. Karoubi said, Mr. Davari, who is a member of the NTP and is one of my friends, prepared the CD with several others and Mr. E[brahim] Sh[arifi] is in touch with Mr. Davari.¹³
The details of the investigation and the baselessness of the issues raised in regard to Taraneh Mousavi were also raised with Mr. Karoubi and it was said, “Now that the truth has been clarified for you, at least accept that in several matters, such as concerning S[aideh] P[uraqayi], which has been discussed, are erroneous and prejudiced and that such false and incorrect things have been prepared and published against the system and the people and have become the best source for the enemies and, considering what you said in the previous session, that if it was confirmed to you that something was erroneous, that you would courageously declare that you have erred, you should now explain to the people in the requisite fashion so that perhaps some of the ill effects of this great insult and slander be eliminated.” Mr. Karoubi replied that he had other issues and that whenever all of them have been confirmed for me, he would announce he had erred.
As a result of all the thorough investigations which were made and listening to Mr. Karoubi’s statements and carefully reviewing the CDs presented by him and holding numerous and intensive meetings and the other measures which were taken, the explanation of which are presented as attachments, the Tribunal reached the following conclusion. Not only is there no evidence indicating the rape, as claimed by Mr. Karoubi, and the claims raised are without documentation and empty of truth, but the claims and documents presented are all forgeries and assembled to deceive public opinion. This is in the process of investigation by the judicial and security authorities to uproot the matter. The final conclusion of this will be announced so as to illuminate public opinion.

Recommendations:

1. The conclusion of the Tribunal’s report be conveyed to the public through the mass media.
2. The report be sent to the upright judicial authority so that the propagandists and aides and those who are continuing the anti-security measures against the system of the aftermath of the tenth presidential election and are continuing down this same line and current by spreading lies and presenting accusations and slander are, in addition to disturbing public opinion about the character and credibility of some of the system’s institution, insults the character and respect of some people might be confronted justly and decisively.

Members of the Tribunal:

1. First Aide to the President of the Judiciary Ebrahim Raisi
2. Attorney General Gholam-Hosein Mohseni-Ejei
3. President of the Presidential Body of the Judiciary Ali Khalaf

Notes:
0a The award-winning reformist daily. Its closing in July 1999 sparked the biggest anti-government demonstrations in Tehran since 1981. It was edited by Mohammad Mousavi-Khoeniha.
0b Hasan Younesi-Oshkuri, the son of Hojjatoleslam Ali Younesi, who was forced to resign as Minister of Intelligence after his complicity in the Serial Murders was uncovered under the Khatami administration, was not executed, but became an adviser in the Green Movement.
0c According to the Iranian Human Rights Documentation Center’s Deadly Fatwa – Iran’s 1988 Prison Massacre, he was Tehran’s Deptury Prosecutor at the time of this massacre and often sat in place of his superior as a member of the Tehran Death Commission in charge of ordering the executions. (p. 25)
0c We have not been able to document this.
1 This is the only name spelled out, since the government has publicly acknowledged her case (in its own fraudulent way) with its Taraneh Mousavi Show. In a later interview, Ejei said that Karoubi admitted the logic of the Tribunal’s position that the Taraneh Mousavi story was baseless, but refused to say so publicly. Saying this puts Karoubi in a position now of publicly affirming or denying this.
1a This refers to Ebrahim Sharifi. In a later interview, Ejei claims that he was connected to an unspecified embassy. This was the Italian embassy. Here is a translation of a thumbnail biography of him (without necessarily endorsing allegations of his inside information about electoral fraud):

Student activist Ebrahim Sharifi was arrested in his father’s in his father’s house in Aqdasiyeh, Tehran. He was a blogger and supporter and electoral observer for Engineer Mir Hosein Mousavi. Three days after the elections, he was arrested and after a week, was transfered to a hospital due to the severity of his injuries. He was rearrested today in his father’s house in Aqdasiyeh accused of spying for Italy [!] for the sole cause that he had intended to continue his studies and return to Italy and was for that reason busy studying Italian in the Italian Embassy’s school located on Farmaniyeh. If the other charges against him are writing an article for the website Ruz and an interview with foreign radio stations and Italy’s Voice of Freedom, it is necessary to note that he was in very good physical condition and had no physical handicap. [As written] It is necessary to note that he was a friend of Mohammad Mehdi Asghar, the manager of the IT team of the Ministry of the Interior who had published the real figures of the electoral fraud (who was mistakenly named “Asgari”). He claimed to have a USB drive. Mr. Asghar, before being murdered by the government in an arranged accident, communicated his true information to him…

2 The Committee to Pursue the Matters of the Arrested and Injured in the Recent Events, founded jointly by Mousavi and Karoubi.
3 In the original story, it is only the daughter who is crying “Allahu akbar.” If this were true, according to that narrative, both the mother and the daughter would have been taken away.
4 In the original story, it was her upper body which had been burned with acid. In addition, the original narrative had her mother identify the body. This omission is used by Ejei in a later interview to ask who saw the acid burns. There, Ejei quotes her sister denying these elements of the story and more, but, curiously, includes her demand that the document for her secret arrest be turned over to her! In this interview, he even says that Karoubi quoted Maqise as saying that the girl had not been martyred, but was alive! Strange that this did not make it into the Tribunal’s report! And it is difficult to imagine under what circumstances this alleged Mr. Maqise would have admitted such a thing.
5 This is a fascinating statement. It seems that the people who organized the false memorial for Saideh Puraqayi actually tried to get leaders of the Green Movement to attend.
6 This is a remarkably weak and disappointing statement. After creating a national furor over the issue of rape and abuse, he is portrayed here as almost completely retreating from these claims. Karoubi’s response, if he gets the chance to make it, will be closely watched.
6a There is a Mohammad Davari, who was the editor of Karoubi’s website and arrested by the security forces on September 9. However, in an interview given after the Tribunal’s report was released, it appears that he is referring to a different Davari, whose whereabouts are unknown.
6b This is refuted in a video (in Persian) published by Reza Allamehzadeh of a statement by Ebrahim Sharifi.

7 Note the repetition of the mother’s alleged presence.
8 This is a very creepy section of the Tribunal’s report. The insinuation seems to be that the Green Movement killed Saideh Puraqayi in order to create a martyr. Otherwise, how would they have inside knowledge into her death?
9 Here, the Tribunal is using the rumor-mongers’ story against the Green Movement by tweaking it an making it appear somehow sinister. The reader is expected to ask, “How did Mousavi hear about this girl’s murder when neither the police nor her mother did.” And then there is the general creep factor which permeates this part of the Tribunal’s narrative and is supposed to stick to Mousavi.
10 Javad Emam was Mir Hosein Mousavi’s campaign manager and was arrested soon after the disturbances over the elections broke out. His daughter had recently been arrested and released after being interrogated for 24 hours. He was recently released. Again, the Tribunal’s narrative builds on this sense of moral dissonance by having members of two different couples of the opposite gender being alone with each other.
11 Mr. Katouzian is a member of the Majlis’ human rights committee. The regime tried to smear him as a supporter of the Taraneh Mousavi rumor-mongers, which he is not.
12 Indeed, Mehdi Karoubi did publicly change his mind on this issue.
13 This remains unclear.

Source:
http://tabnak.ir/fa/pages/?cid=63860, posted 21 Shahrivar 1388 = September 12, 2009.

Acknowledgment:
Iranian Leftists has published a translation of its own of this document.